Well there are several interesting articles today on the lack of Weapons of Mass Destruction story. Terence Jeffrey suggests that presidential candidate Bob Graham of Florida, who was on the intelligence committee, knows that the evidence presented was good. In his argument he presents a discussion with Paul Anderson, Graham's communications director, who says of his candidate, "He believes that the intelligence that was presented suggested that." Theres the rub right there--was the intelligence presented complete enough to paint a full picture? Paul Anderson, Graham's communications director suggests that Graham believed it was honest information, but that's a) his opinion and b) still doesn't answer if the picture presented was complete.
Then David Limbaugh takes a different tack and simply presents the evidence gathered so far, denies it, and asks, "Whom do you trust, and who truly has the nation's best interests at heart?"
That's the $64,000.00 question.
No comments:
Post a Comment