They can rescue their happy vision for stock returns by claiming that the Social Security actuaries are vastly underestimating future economic growth. But in that case, we don't need to worry about Social Security's future: if the economy grows fast enough to generate a rate of return that makes privatization work, it will also yield a bonanza of payroll tax revenue that will keep the current system sound for generations to come.It's a little bit like the old "heads you win, tails I lose" scheme I used to play as a kid. Other kids loved to play that with me, but it took it's tole. In the seventh grade alone I lost $52,304.25 to that game.
Alternatively, privatizers can unhappily admit that future stock returns will be much lower than they have been claiming. But without those high returns, the arithmetic of their schemes collapses.
It really is that stark: any growth projection that would permit the stock returns the privatizers need to make their schemes work would put Social Security solidly in the black.
“Well, I've been in the city for 30 years and I've never once regretted being a nasty, greedy, cold-hearted, avaricious money-grubber... er, Conservative!” - Monty Python's Flying Circus, Season 2, Episode 11, How Not To Be Seen
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
Social Security Sanity
The incredible Paul Krugman writes another solid editorial on Social Security Phase out today, making a point I've made before (which I probably ripped off of him).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment