Recently, several Bush supporters took issue with my suggesting that the president's stance on winning the war on terror was indeed a flip-flop.He then proceeds to list a few the dozens of times President Bush has flip-flopped. Such as on the need for a Homeland Security office or Campaign Finance Reform. But of course, President Bush by virtue of being President Bush, a Republican, a Conservative, cannot really flip-flop. When he appears to flip flop, and it's often, you need to look a little closer to realize how it's not really a flip flop. Or something.
In addition to calling me "terminally stupid" and reminding me of Sen. John Kerry's numerous flip-flops over the years, one individual posed a direct question: "How can anyone support a candidate who flip-flops?"
His question gave me cause for self-reflection.
My terminal stupidity notwithstanding, I ultimately came to the conclusion that the gentleman was correct. How could anyone support a candidate who flip-flops? Americans want a guy who says what he means and does not deviate. We want Howard Roarke incarnate!
I thought how fortunate we were to have a president who was immune from flip-flops. Could you imagine if President Bush were guilty of flip-flopping? That might change the whole rationale for supporting his candidacy.
“Well, I've been in the city for 30 years and I've never once regretted being a nasty, greedy, cold-hearted, avaricious money-grubber... er, Conservative!” - Monty Python's Flying Circus, Season 2, Episode 11, How Not To Be Seen
Monday, September 20, 2004
Watch them All Fall Down!
Bob Herbert has a good article over at Working For Change on the Flip-Flop Mantra. His take on it isn't entirely new, but it is entertaining.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment